Top Republicans Warn Trump’s Germany Troop Cut Sends ‘Wrong Signal’ to Putin

Reflecto News | Breaking News | U.S. Foreign Policy

WASHINGTON — Two senior Republican lawmakers have publicly broken with President Donald Trump over his decision to withdraw approximately 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany, warning that the move risks “undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin” .

In a rare public rebuke of the commander-in-chief, Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama—the Republican chairs of the Senate and House Armed Services committees, respectively—issued a joint statement expressing deep concern over the Pentagon’s announcement, which was made on Friday .

“Prematurely reducing America’s forward presence in Europe before those capabilities are fully realized risks undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to Vladimir Putin.”
— Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.)

The lawmakers argued that instead of being sent home, the 5,000 troops scheduled for withdrawal should be moved further east—closer to Russia’s borders—to bolster NATO’s front-line defenses .

📉 Trump Doubles Down: ‘We’re Cutting a Lot Further’

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the withdrawal on Friday, although the Pentagon framed the decision as a routine review of force posture in Europe . However, President Trump quickly escalated the move on Saturday, telling reporters in Florida that the pullout would be significantly larger than the initial 5,000 figure.

“We’re going to cut way down, and we’re cutting a lot further than 5,000.”
— President Donald J. Trump

As part of the decision, a Biden-era plan to deploy a U.S. battalion armed with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany has also been canceled—a move Berlin had strongly advocated for as a counterweight to Russian aggression . Analysts warn this cancellation creates a critical gap, as the U.S. holds what one expert called a “factual monopoly inside NATO” on long-range precision fires .

🇩🇪 Berlin Takes It in Stride, Sees Opportunity

Despite the tense political rhetoric, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius took a measured tone, refusing to escalate the row with Washington.

“It was anticipated that the U.S. might withdraw troops. We Europeans must take on more responsibility for our own security.”
— Boris Pistorius, German Defense Minister

Pistorius noted that Germany is “on the right track,” citing plans to expand the Bundeswehr, accelerate military procurement, and increase defense infrastructure spending . Germany is now projected to spend 3.1% of its GDP on defense, factoring in aid to Ukraine—far exceeding NATO’s 2% target .

🇪🇺 An ‘Alliance in Disintegration’

The troop cut comes amid escalating transatlantic tensions over the war in Iran and trade tariffs. President Trump has openly sparred with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who recently suggested the U.S. was being “humiliated” by Iranian negotiators—a remark Trump called “nonsense” .

The diplomatic rupture has alarmed other European leaders. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk issued a stark warning on Saturday:

“The greatest threat to the transatlantic community is not its external enemies, but the ongoing disintegration of our alliance. We must all do what it takes to reverse this disastrous trend.”
— Donald Tusk, Prime Minister of Poland

🐘 A Split Within the GOP

The withdrawal plan has highlighted a split within the Republican Party. While the armed services committee chairs voiced opposition, other Republicans have rallied behind the president.

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.) tweeted his support, mocking Germany’s posture while taking a jab at the Senate:

“Pulling 5K American troops from the arrogant Germans. Maybe we should send them the Senate. Better match, and western Europe would be so well protected by the League of the Royal Filibuster.”

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, argued the decision was “not grounded in any coherent U.S. national security policy, strategy, or even analysis” but rather the “hurt feelings of a president who is seeking political vengeance” .

📊 How We Got Here

Follow Reflecto News for continuous updates on this developing story and all breaking news from around the world.