Merz: Iran Sanctions Relief Can Be Part of Process — ‘Anything That Ends This Conflict Quickly Feels Good’
Published on Reflecto News | World News | Diplomacy & Geopolitics
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has signaled openness to a phased resolution of the Iran conflict, stating that the easing of sanctions could be part of a diplomatic process. His remarks, made during a press conference in Berlin, position Germany as a potential bridge between Washington’s demand for Iranian capitulation and Tehran’s insistence on sanctions relief as a precondition for a deal .
“The easing of sanctions on Iran can be part of a process. For me, anything that ends this conflict — and as quickly as possible — feels good.” — Friedrich Merz, Chancellor of Germany
A Shift in Tone
Merz’s statement is notable for its pragmatism. The chancellor did not endorse Iran’s nuclear program or its regional activities, but he also did not repeat the “maximum pressure” language that has characterized the Trump administration’s approach .
Instead, Merz framed the issue as one of conflict resolution, not punishment. His “as quickly as possible” formulation suggests that ending the war is a higher priority for Berlin than extracting maximal concessions from Tehran. This sets Germany apart from the United States, where President Trump has stated that he has “all the time in the world” and that a deal will only be made “when it’s appropriate and good for the United States.”
The Domestic Context
Merz’s government faces significant pressure to end the conflict, which has disrupted German energy supplies and sent inflation higher . The war has also created uncertainty for German industry, which relies on stable energy prices and open trade routes through the Persian Gulf.
By signaling openness to sanctions relief, Merz may also be trying to preserve Germany’s role as a diplomatic intermediary. Berlin has maintained communication channels with Tehran throughout the war, even as it refused to join the US-led military campaign. A constructive German role could be essential if the ceasefire collapses and new negotiations are required.
The ‘Process’ Question
Merz’s reference to a “process” suggests that he envisions a phased approach: perhaps a temporary easing of sanctions in exchange for a verified pause in enrichment, followed by more permanent measures as compliance is demonstrated. This stands in contrast to the “all or nothing” approach that has characterized US-Iran negotiations to date.
Possible Phased Approach:
| Phase | Iran Concessions | Sanctions Relief |
|---|---|---|
| Initial | Verified enrichment pause | Limited suspension of oil sanctions |
| Interim | IAEA access, stockpile reduction | Release of frozen assets |
| Final | Permanent program limits | Full sanctions removal |
The US Reaction
The White House has not yet responded to Merz’s comments. The Trump administration has insisted that Iran must agree to a complete end to its nuclear program and the return of its stockpiled uranium before any sanctions are lifted.
However, some US officials have signaled openness to a phased approach, provided the initial steps are verifiable and irreversible. Vance told reporters after the first round of talks that “we put a lot on the table” and that Iran moved closer to US positions.
What Comes Next
Merz’s statement may be timed to influence the next round of US-Iran talks, which are expected to take place in Islamabad in the coming days. A German willingness to support a phased sanctions-relief framework could give the Trump administration political cover to offer Tehran a diplomatic off-ramp.
It could also provide Iran with the economic relief it craves without requiring an immediate, comprehensive surrender of its nuclear program. Whether the hardliners in Tehran and Washington will accept such a compromise remains the central question.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What did Merz say about Iran sanctions?
Merz stated that “the easing of sanctions on Iran can be part of a process,” adding that “anything that ends this conflict — and as quickly as possible — feels good.”
2. Is Germany changing its Iran policy?
Germany has consistently opposed the US-led military campaign and has called for diplomatic solutions. Merz’s statement reaffirms that position, but his explicit endorsement of sanctions relief is a new formulation.
3. Does Merz support Iran’s nuclear program?
No. Merz did not endorse Iran’s nuclear program. His statement focused on conflict resolution, not approval of Iranian policies.
4. How does this differ from the US position?
President Trump has insisted that Iran must agree to a complete end to its nuclear program before any sanctions are lifted. Merz is signaling openness to a phased approach.
5. What is the status of US-Iran talks?
A second round of talks is expected in Islamabad in the coming days. US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are expected to travel to Pakistan, while Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is already in Islamabad for consultations.
6. Is the ceasefire still in effect?
Yes. President Trump extended the ceasefire earlier this week, but it remains fragile. Iran has refused to send a delegation for a second round of talks until the US lifts its naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.
Stay informed with Reflecto News – Your trusted source for breaking diplomatic and geopolitical intelligence. Subscribe for real-time updates on the Iran crisis, US-Europe relations, and global security developments.